REQUIREMENTS OF S.342 CRPC.

2008 YLR AJ AJ AND K 2866A
LAW
REQUIRED THAT EVERY PART OF INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE CIRCUMSTANCES ,ETC SOUYGHT
TO BE USED AGAINST ACCUSED SHOULD BE PUT TO HIM UNDER S.342 CRPC FOR HAVING HIS
EXPLAINATION
ANY PIECE
OF EVIDENCE , WHICH WAS NOT PUT TO THE ACCUSED IN HIS EXAMINATION UNDER S.342
CRPC COULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AGAINST HIM FOR CONVICTION
2012 YLR BAL 442(c)
S.342
LAW REQUIRED
THAT EVERY PART /PEACE OF THE INCRIMINATINGEVIDENCE, CIRCUMSTANCES ETC SOUGHT
TO BE USED AGAINST ACCUSE, SHOULD BE PUT TO HIM UNDER S.342 CRPC FOR HAVING HIS
EXPLAINATION
2012 YLR BAL 580(c)
S.342...
S.302
EACH THING
SHOULD BE PUT OVER ACCUSED
EVERY BIT
OF INCRIMINATING EVICENCE MUST BE PUT OT THE ACCUSED IN HIS EXAMINATIONU/S 342
CRPCSOASTO SEEK HISREPLY ...FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL EXEMPT THE ACCUSED FROM ANY
PENAL ACTION AGAINST HIM IN RESPECT OF THE MISSED PIECE OF EVIDENCE
2011 PCRLJ 778 (c ) LAH
REQUIREMENTS
OF STATEMENTS U/S342 CRpc
Law require that each
incriminationg circumstans must be put to the accused in his statemet5nu/s 342
crpc as to affoard him an apportunity to explainhis position… Left out piece of
incrimination cirumstantces cannot be used against an accuse to base conviction
there on
2012 YLR 2764 (b) LAH